Amazon provided user-unapproved police ring footage

Share facebook
Share twitter

Owner of the Ring range of doorbells and security cameras is Amazon. When a senator inquired about the company’s privacy practices, it disclosed information that would worry some of its users. Without user permission, Amazon gave footage will police from its Ring devices.

Privacy is one of the public’s top priorities in the modern world. Each home has at least one linked device at any one time. This gadget can record and transmit audio or visual data to, well, everyone! For this reason, businesses make every effort to persuade customers that their data is secure.

But something always manages to get through. Whether the business secretly violates the guidelines it has set forth or hides a little gap in the terms of service. Whatever the reason, a lot of individuals simply don’t feel secure when they purchase a new connected device.

Advertisement WITHOUT USER CONSENT, AMAZON GAVE POLICE RING FOOTAGE It’s not as simple as obvious wrongdoing in the case of Amazon and Ring. When Senator Edward Markey questioned Amazon about its privacy practices, the retailer admitted that it had indeed given law authorities access to Ring footage 11 times.

The firm presented the following justification in its defense:

As we have frequently stated to our customers and others, it is simply incorrect that Ring provides unauthorized access to user data or video. If a corporation, like Ring, considers that an emergency involving danger of death or significant physical injury to any person, like an abduction or an attempted murder, demands disclosure without delay, the law permits the company to transmit information to government bodies. Ring upholds that legal requirement.

Advertisement According to the firm, it implies that Amazon only provides law enforcement with access to data in cases where there has been property damage or fatalities. On some level, that makes sense. Additionally, we are unsure of the situations under which Amazon itself is required to provide the data.

HOWEVER It’s not quite that simple. The question of what law enforcement wanted to do with the tape and who it was chasing down in a situation like this is always present. The characteristics of the 11 clips that were turned in were kept a secret by both the firm and police enforcement.

We don’t know whether the video truly showed any misconduct, if that’s even the case. This complicates matters because egregious prejudices like systemic corruption, racism, misogyny, homophobia, and transphobia permeate the highest echelons of government. It’s impossible to predict if law enforcement would request video that will lead to a mistaken arrest or indictment.

Advertisement These are the issues that we must consider. Although what Amazon claimed made logic, it was only written down. There is no way for us to truly feel secure installing a Ring device—or any connected gadget, for that matter—until we know what was in those clips shared.

Related Posts